I am not sure how administrators decide who to pick on in their school, but I have always thought it went something like this: the staff roster is put on a dart board. The principal puts on a blindfold, turns around three times, and then throws a dart at the roster. He/she does this two times. The first name that is hit is the person in the building that can do no wrong. The second name is the person who can do no right. A Golden Boy and a Whipping Boy as it were.
I have been at four schools. I’ve had at least ten principals and about as twice as many assistant principals. I’ve taught in affluent areas, middle class areas, and in low income schools. I’ve had good principals (a handful) bad ones, sexist ones, incompetent ones, and unqualified ones (being a speech therapist does not mean you know anything about instruction no matter what college classes you have taken or how inflated your sense of self is. If you haven’t taught, you don’t belong in a position that evaluates how others do it, period).
I work in a school that has, for the most part, and outstanding staff. They are dedicated, passionate, and they work their asses off.
And then there are the few, the lame, the “I’m doing you all a favor by showing up” types. In fact, we have an entire grade level team that pretty much belittles, threatens, and bullies their students. They have no regard for individual needs. There is a teacher of very young children who yells and puts kids in the corner.
Guess which teachers our admin is riding hard?
I don’t know why this happens. I wish I did. I think my administrator is a compassionate, caring, and responsible leader. But there are blind spots. Quibbling over which words to teach in a phonics lesson. Bringing pencil pushing middle management types from the curriculum office out to a strong, skilled and hard working team to point out all the things they are doing wrong. Ignoring the teacher at the end of the hall who pretty much showed movies for her social studies instruction for a month last year.
My guess is it has to do with test scores.
If you class has good scores, you are off the hook. The ends clearly justify the means. And the means can translate into excluding some students from meaningful instruction if they don’t fit the mold.
Every year I sit in meetings where we are shown graphs and charts that say students with special education services aren’t scoring as well as the other kids. And the unspoken message seems to be “it’s your fault.” If doesn’t matter if my student can read books he loves independently, or write a complete sentence without help now. He’s not making the cut. He’s not scoring well. And somehow I am to blame.
I’m told, “he needs to be able to develop strategies to read grade level text. That should be in his IEP.”
Well, if he could read grade level text, he wouldn’t need a fucking IEP because he wouldn’t be learning disabled. Learning disabilities aren’t something kids grow out of. They don’t suddenly find Jesus one summer and come back in the fall able to read and write as well as the other kids. They may always need a calculators because their number sense and rote memory is poor. I took Algebra for three years and I remember nothing. I spent three years never getting better, never quite understanding, always struggling to get a C. I could have taken Algebra for another three years and I would still have not been able to tell you was x equaled. X equals your mom, okay?